Snapshot Summary: Charity Fraud Awareness Week 2024
11.30.2024 | Linda J. Rosenthal, JD
A year ago, in March 2015, we reported on a landmark development in federal grants administration. In “New Year, New Accounting Rule: But Don’t Sleep Through This One,” we warned that it was all about “overhead” and “reasonable indirect costs” and “cost allocation rules”: ordinarily a snooze-inducing topic. Nevertheless, there was lots of excitement about it:
The Controller of the Office of Management and Budget waxed poetic about the OMB Uniform Guidance: ‘[T]his historic reform will transform the landscape [for government grants and contracts]. . . for generations to come.’
The new OMB rules “were a signature accomplishment of the pro-nonprofit lobbying of the National Council of Nonprofits” which “released enthusiastic comments, … calling them “… a major victory for people who depend on nonprofits every day.”
What’s all the fuss about? In a nutshell, the federal government acknowledged that nonprofits had been seriously underpaid for services rendered under federal grants and contracts. “Since the federal government is a source of money that flows through to the states and local governments, (which make their own grants and contracts), this problem appeared in government awards at all levels and around the nation.” For contracts entered into on and after December 26, 2014, all of these governments –
that hire nonprofits to deliver services are now required to reimburse nonprofits for the reasonable indirect costs (sometimes called ‘overhead’ or ‘administrative’ costs) they incur on behalf of governments when federal dollars are part of the funding stream.
The nonprofit community was “encouraged to … be proactive in enforcing these new rights for their benefit” because they “may encounter resistance from federal, state, or local employees, or other opposition based on lack of knowledge or understanding of these new rules.”