Restricted Gifts: A Primer
12.04.2025 | Linda J. Rosenthal, JD
Still calling your nonprofit’s top leader the “Executive Director” when your bylaws say “President”? Let’s clear up the confusion around nonprofit officer titles — and why it matters more than you think.
Let’s be honest: nonprofit job titles can feel like alphabet soup.
We’ve seen everything — Executive Director, CEO, President, Managing Director, Grand Poobah (okay, maybe not that last one, but give it time). While it might seem like a matter of personal preference or branding flair, these titles can have very real — and very legal — implications.
This isn’t just a paperwork problem. It’s a governance issue. And when roles aren’t clearly defined or consistently applied, things can go sideways fast — especially when regulators, funders, or your own board come calling.
So let’s break it down.
Here’s where things get tangled: there’s a big difference between job titles and corporate officer roles. Your org might call someone the Executive Director because that’s what “every other nonprofit does.” But if your bylaws say the President is the one in charge — and no one’s officially wearing that hat — you could be inviting confusion (or worse).
So let’s define the two camps:
Where the trouble starts is when these two things don’t match — or worse, contradict each other.
Most state laws (including California’s) expect your nonprofit to name at least three corporate officers:
Some nonprofits have more than three officers, but you must have at least these — and yes, one person can wear more than one hat (with some limits — typically, the President can’t also serve as Secretary or Treasurer).
Let’s dig into the title tangle that causes the most confusion — and the most headaches.
The top staff leader of a nonprofit is often called the Executive Director (ED). It’s a familiar, nonprofit-y title that shows up on business cards, LinkedIn profiles, org charts, and IRS Form 990s. In some cases, you’ll see CEO instead — usually in larger nonprofits or those that want to mirror a for-profit structure. Sometimes, the President is used to mean “the person in charge.” And in rare but chaotic cases, all three titles are floating around — often referring to the same person.
Here’s the problem: while Executive Director and CEO are job titles that describe an employee’s role within the organization, President is often a legally required corporate officer title under state nonprofit corporation law.
So what happens when:
That’s a legal gray area. And gray areas make auditors, regulators, and bank compliance officers very nervous.
Let’s unpack it a bit more.
Scenario 1: ED in Practice, President on Paper (But Not Really)
This is the most common setup we see:
Problem? The Executive Director is actually functioning as the CEO — they manage staff, sign contracts, and make executive decisions. But unless your bylaws or board resolutions specifically designate the ED as President or CEO, they technically don’t have the legal authority to do many of the things they’re doing.
This creates:
Solution: Amend your bylaws to clarify that the Executive Director is also the President (or designate the ED as the CEO and assign them executive authority). Then have the board formally appoint them to that role.
Scenario 2: CEO by Branding, But No Legal Authority
Some nonprofits go the opposite direction. They elevate the title from ED to CEO because it sounds more modern, impressive, or funder-friendly.
But unless the board formally appoints the individual as President or Chief Executive Officer in the board minutes — and the bylaws give that role the proper authority — it’s still just a label.
Example:
Your CEO signs a major vendor contract. The contract is later disputed. The vendor’s attorney asks for documentation that this person had signing authority. But your bylaws say only the President or a board-appointed officer can sign on behalf of the org — and no such resolution exists.
Now you’ve got a problem.
Scenario 3: One Title, Two People
This one’s tricky. Sometimes the President title is used in two places: once for the Board Chair (President of the Board) and once for the chief executive (President of the Organization). Unless your bylaws draw a clear line, this can result in:
Pro tip: Always specify whether “President” refers to the chief staff officer or the Board Chair — and consider using different titles for clarity (e.g., Board Chair and President/CEO).
The IRS Perspective (Yes, This Matters on Form 990)
When you file your Form 990, the IRS wants to know who your Principal Officer is. That person should be the one actually running the show — not a ceremonial board officer.
So if your ED or CEO is the one managing operations, supervising staff, signing major agreements, and overseeing programs — they should be the one listed as the Principal Officer on the 990. But again, that only works if they’ve been properly appointed to a corresponding legal role (like President or CEO) in your records.
Five Sanity-Saving Steps to Get It Right
Here’s what you can do today to start clearing up the confusion:
This might sound like nonprofit inside baseball, but getting your titles and roles aligned is more than just a technical fix. It shows your board, your staff, and your community that you take governance seriously. And that inspires confidence — from funders, regulators, and anyone who’s putting their trust in your organization.
Need a Bylaws Refresh? Or Just a Sanity Check?
We help nonprofits of all shapes and sizes make sense of their leadership structure, ensure compliance with state law, and align their internal roles with external reality.
If your org’s titles are starting to look like a bowl of spaghetti, give us a call. We’re happy to help you untangle it.